Residents associations – the need for communities to join together

“… we got the children’s playground fixed, trees planted, fencing fixed, walls repainted …”

Laura Broxson: Do you have a management company where you live, and do you know what they do? Being stuck at home during the lockdowns gave me a huge insight as to what was going on in my estate, and more so, what our management company was not doing.

Within days of the first lockdown, I witnessed drug dealing, anti-social behaviour and a number of cars were broken in to – as well as the front door of my apartment block. Clearly the only way to eliminate all this is for a shift in society and for more resources and educational opportunities to be put in communities, but in the meantime myself and others were living in fear and needed to take action in terms of preventative measures.

“With life and work, it was easy to allow oneself be fobbed off”

Now, all the above mentioned activity obviously isn’t the fault of the management company, but myself and others had been requesting CCTV for years to at least help put people off – and we had been constantly ignored and fobbed off. With life and work, it was easy to allow oneself be fobbed off, but lockdown meant I now had the time to focus on this.

Continue reading “Residents associations – the need for communities to join together”

Another Cork is Possible

” The City deserves more than to be an addendum to the whims of transnational capital”

Conor McCabe: On 26 July 2021 Cork City Council called on ‘residents, workers, the business sector, community, sporting and voluntary groups in the city and beyond to have their say’ on the proposed 2022-28 Development Plan, with submissions open until 4 October. This was extremely nice of them, but it is also clear that as far as the Council is concerned all the major investment and planning decisions have already been made.

It has left a mere 12-week window from 4 October until 31 December to make any adjustments based on the ideas of the public. The decisions around transport, housing, the docklands, and other so-called regeneration projects are years in the making and have already been signed off on at local and national level.

Continue reading “Another Cork is Possible”

Time to cherish Traveller children equally

Members of the Maughan Families on the Volex site in Castlebar, Co Mayo., with portaloo to the left of the picture

Bernadette Maughan: Three reports published this year investigating conditions faced by the Travelling community in Ireland have once again brought to the fore a structural prejudice that has existed for decades (see, for example, this report on the experience of Travellers in the mainstream labour market). The most stark report, published by the Ombudsman for Children, No End in Site, described the living conditions on one site in Co Cork. Despite Cork County Council’s attempt to defend the lack of progress, the reality is that it is not an isolated case. In fact, it is the lived reality for the Travelling community on many sites across the country.

Continue reading “Time to cherish Traveller children equally”

Tax Cuts over Investment will mean Austerity for the Majority.

Conor McCabe discusses the truth about the government’s summer economic statement and the continuation of austerity through high rents, low wages, increased costs and a lack of investment in our social infrastructure.

Dr Conor McCabe

Last week the government published the Summer Economic Statement and laid out the broad spending parameters for the budget in October.

Released late on Wednesday 14 July, less than 24 hours before the Dáil summer recess, it was quickly hailed by the media as proof positive of a dramatic and significant turnaround in economic policy by the government parties of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Greens.

The Irish Times stated that the apparent change in direction was ‘undeniably linked to the housing crisis and the political fallout awaiting Coalition parties if the status quo continues’.[1]

At the same time the Irish Independent loudly proclaimed that Paschal Donoghue had loosened the purse strings, with the expected post-pandemic boom funding ‘four years of tax cuts’.[2]

The good times, it seems, are on the horizon. The government has learned the error of its ways.

Only The Journal.ie voiced a note of caution, having read the actual document instead of just quoting from the executive summary and assorted press releases.

It found no specific financial allocation to housing anywhere in the Statement, merely a commitment to fix the housing crisis – which is, after all, already government policy.

‘We don’t know exactly how much the Government plans to allocate specifically to housing in Budget 2022’ it said. Nor will we have a clear idea until the Housing For All strategy is published on 26 July.

In fact, far from being a dramatic change in direction, the Summer Economic Statement reveals a government and a state that remains in thrall to the market and the fiction of tax-cut-led growth.

In terms of expenditure, the Statement says that the government will allocate an extra €1.1 billion to capital projects in 2022. (Sinn Féin has pointed out that once allocations are made to the Brexit Adjustment Reserve, in reality this figure will be in the order of €800m.)

This extra funding will stretch across all government departments, including not just housing but health, education, transport, as well as climate action measures.

To put that into context, the ESRI recently said that the state would need to spend an extra €2 billion a year on social housing alone in order to have any chance of tacking the housing crisis.

Whatever measures the government comes up with in the Housing for All strategy and in the October budget, it is clear that any net increase in housing spend will be of the order of hundreds of millions, and nowhere near the €2 billion that is actually needed for 2022.

The one figure that is crystal clear in the Statement, though, relates to tax cuts.

At a time when the need for capital investment in our social infrastructure has never been stronger nor clearer, the government has announced €500m in tax cuts every year for the next four years.

In other words, instead of putting €2 billion into social housing, the government has instead committed itself to €2 billion in tax cuts.

This defies all logic and is completely geared towards the minority of voters in Ireland who crave such cuts over services[3] – a minority that nonetheless in all likelihood votes Fine Gael.

This would explain why the Tánaiste Leo Varadkar has been calling for such cuts, despite a clear majority of people in Ireland in favour of investment in social services.

The Tánaiste and his party, with the support of Fianna Fáil and the Greens, are engaged in an ideological project that sees tax avoidance as a God-given right and to hell with the consequences.

For all their talk of the national interest, the government parties are pandering to their base with a rugged determination.

At the same time, there is a grain of truth in the ‘lessons learned’ line of the establishment media.

The Summer Economic Statement shows that there are no overt austerity cuts on the horizon for at least the next two years.

It has placed warning signs on the period 2024 onwards, saying that the EU fiscal rules in all likelihood will have returned by then, and that in 2023 the government will borrow for capital spend only.

This approach, however, will have the benefit of sparing the coalition government any attention-grabbing cuts to services.

However, austerity will continue as in its present form, through high rents, low wages, increased costs and a lack of properly focused investment in our social infrastructure.

This includes a lack of investment not only in housing, but also in health, education, transport, care (including childcare) – as well the type of visionary climate action plan that present circumstances demand.

And by investment we mean genuine public investment – not privatised outsourced solutions that end up costing billions with no net long-term benefit to the state.

The lack of an overt austerity agenda also means that for those of us on the left, there will be a need for a more focused and analytical approach to the right-wing agenda of Fine Gael, Fianna Fail and the Greens.

The devil, for the next two years at least, is going to be in the detail. Shouts of ‘cuts’ are not going to be enough, and with that in mind, now would be a good time to adapt our research and analysis accordingly.


[1] Eoin Burke-Kennedy. ‘Q&A: Why has the Government changed its economic policy?’ Irish Times, 15 July 2021. https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/q-a-why-has-the-government-changed-its-economic-policy-1.4621294

[2] Philip Ryan. ‘Post-pandemic boom to fund four years of tax cuts as Donohoe loosens purse strings.’ Irish Independent, 15 July 2021. https://www.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/tax/post-pandemic-boom-to-fund-four-years-of-tax-cuts-as-donohoe-loosens-purse-strings-40655232.html

[3] Michael Brennan. ‘Public don’t want tax cuts at expense of public services, poll reveals’. Business Post, 27 June 2021. https://www.businesspost.ie/politics/public-dont-want-tax-cuts-at-expense-of-public-services-poll-reveals-953e3fbd

Why love puppies, and eat pigs?

Why love one, and eat the other?

The case for including animal rights in ‘left’ campaigns

Laura Broxson: Animal rights, often last on the list of social justice campaigns, is actually where I began my journey as a ‘left’ activist, over eighteen years ago. With almost 120 million – yes, million – animals killed in slaughterhouses in Ireland in 2020, according to figures obtained from the Department of Agriculture following an FOI request, isn’t it time we included a fight against speciesism in our campaigns?

The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted how catastrophic zoonotic diseases can be for the human population, and has made a lot of individuals re-evaluate their choices in terms of what they consume. Climate change has also resulted in a reflection in this regard. But let’s take away pandemics and climate change, and look at this from a purely anti-speciesist perspective.

Continue reading “Why love puppies, and eat pigs?”